|
Isostatic Rebound
A very important point to consider is the discovery of a possible massive crater located in Finland. The explanation given by science for this giant arc formation is that it was formed by glacial movement during the Ice Ages. Another explanation has been offered by Richard Firestone (The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes) who states this formation was likely caused by meteor impact. Also entering this debate is the question "did ice fields really even exist in Europe?". D.S. Allen and J.B. Delair (Cataclysm) have shown that much of the evidence used by science to conclude thick ice cover can also be attributable to mega-floods and enormous thermal nuclear blasts (impacts). Is it possible that Europe was covered in vegetation, not ice, during the so-called "Ice Ages"? The common thread in this debate is the time period this giant arc was formed, which is 12,000 to 14,000 years ago. This time frame is in accordance with the date given by The Great Pyramid for a major impact event.
An important clue is that this possible crater is closely centered at the point of maximum isostatic rebound in Northern Europe. Science's explanation for this rebound is that the land was greatly depressed by weight of massive ice fields during the period known as the Ice Ages. The theory goes that upon these ice fields melting, the compressed land began to rebound upwards. We know this land is still rebounding today. Given the isostatic rebound is centered on this possible crater, is it not possible meteor impact and not weight of ice fields caused this land compression? Did detonation force this landmass down into the Earth's core? While considering this point remember we do not definitively know whether ice fields even existed at this location.
While investigating the other main area of isostatic rebound, which is situated in North America, I found this rebound was also centered on a huge arc formation, the previously discussed Hudson Bay Crater. This appears to be an incredible coincidence, or is it?
Is it not possible these compressions happened instantaneously upon meteor impact and not over thousands of years as offered by science? The core scientific evidence in no way discounts this possibility. If these compression points were created instantly by impacts, the entire planet was dramatically effected.
|
|